Mention kind in docs for local development

[corneliusweig]

See #1980

[corneliusweig]

I'm asking myself, if it is acceptable to link to answers on github issues from the skaffold.dev docs.

I think this could help people getting more detailed information while at the same time keeping the docs somewhat manageable. On the other hand, the "doc experience" with github issues is not very comfortable. WDYT?

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #2090 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2090   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.12%   56.12%           
=======================================
  Files         180      180           
  Lines        7756     7756           
=======================================
  Hits         4353     4353           
  Misses       2987     2987           
  Partials      416      416

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ceda301...fca0b0e. Read the comment docs.

[balopat]

I'm asking myself, if it is acceptable to link to answers on github issues from the skaffold.dev docs.

I think this could help people getting more detailed information while at the same time keeping the docs somewhat manageable. On the other hand, the "doc experience" with github issues is not very comfortable. WDYT?

I think we should in general copy and sanitize reference type of information from Github issues as they are "mutable" things can change, deleted, moved and originally meant for discussion not for documentation. For historical reference we can definitely link to them - but not more than that.